Home / Talogy blog / How do candidates really feel about completing employee assessments?

How do candidates really feel about completing employee assessments?

woman wearing gold glasses
Last week, I published a blog post on why shorter assessments are not the answer to the recruitment challenges posed by today’s competitive labour market. Organisations are concerned about candidate attrition during the selection process; a common concern that we hear from clients is about the length of our employee assessments and the probability of a candidate completing it. Conventional wisdom suggests that assessments, especially long assessments, are perceived unfavourably by candidates and they will not complete the assessment. The purpose of this analysis was to investigate the number of candidates who complete our assessment across a variety of lengths and industries. To examine this question, we collected data from across 43 unique client organisations and 12 assessments. The clients represented the manufacturing, retail, service, and health-care industries. The number of candidate records examined was 887,110. After analysis, a clear trend emerged in the data: completion rates are high! Candidates who begin assessments finish them, regardless of test length. The following table shows that, in most cases, more than 90% of candidates complete the assessment.
completion rates by assessment type
Grouping the assessments into categories helps to frame the results:
  • Screening assessments (20-30 mins) have completion rates averaging 97.3%. This completion rate is consistent across industries – manufacturing, service/retail, and health-care.
  • The professional/leadership assessments, which are typically longer (45-60 mins) and placed farther down in the recruitment process, also have a high completion rate of around 95%.
  • The longer (70 mins), comprehensive entry-level assessments, which are typically positioned at the top of the recruitment funnel, include difficult problem-solving sections and multi-media interactive simulations are still very high, at 89.3%. Some candidates who are only passively interested in a position may drop out at this stage because they are not yet psychologically invested in the position because of this increased demand. This can work in the employer’s favour – if a candidate is not interested in taking a job-related simulation-based assessment, will they be truly interested in the job? Perhaps candidates who may not complete the assessment are self-selecting out of the recruitment process, still achieving the result you are seeking.
Here are a few highlights, to summarise candidate findings:
  • When candidates start an assessment, they are highly likely to finish it, regardless of test length.
  • All of our assessments have high completion rates.
  • Completion rates differ based on comprehensiveness, volume, and placement in the recruitment process.
  • The concern that candidates will drop out of a recruitment process once they start an assessment is not supported by the data.

Improve recruitment efficiency, effectiveness, and the candidate experience

A practical advice guide for 2022 and beyond
Finding good talent is a struggle. The intense, worldwide competition for the right talent calls for organisations to design better, frictionless hiring processes. Download our advice guide to understand how to build a better hiring process in 2022. You will discover:  
  • How to really treat hiring as a two-way street
  • What the new expectations are for talent acquisition and hiring managers
  • How to maximise process and efficiency
  Research has shown that 83% of applicants say that a negative hiring experience harms their image of the organisation. With the current candidate market conditions, organisations cannot afford to have a less than optimal hiring process. Our advice guide shows you some of the key considerations for improving efficiency, effectiveness, and the candidate experience.
  • The dark side of artificial intelligence: Is AI good or bad?

    In recent times, we have seen widespread momentum of AI adoption; which is no surprise given the tangible benefits of using AI in the workplace, such as being an…

    Read more

  • High professionals vs. high potentials: What leaders must know

    Imagine that you are a manager of a star employee. You are excited to have your annual review with them this year because you will be delivering a raving…

    Read more

  • How to develop career paths for employees: A practical guide for leaders

    In a tight job market, employee development has become more than just a differentiator, it’s an expectation. Experts are retiring and technology is rapidly progressing, making it critical to…

    Read more

Share